Editor’s Note: Judy Wilyman, a PhD student based at the University of Wollongong, is researching government vaccination policies.
And it’s just as well, because vaccination policy is all over the place, seemingly driven by vaccine manufacturers with little regard for human safety.
i2P is not interested in the extreme politics of vaccination, simply safe vaccination.
It is obvious that our current government has not done its homework properly, because the proposal to make vaccines mandatory is simply bad policy.
Judy has been continuously corresponding with Tim Wilson, Human Rights Commissioner. keeping him updated and requesting interventions where necessary.
The “ducking” and “weaving” can only be regarded as extraordinary and we publish just one letter, the most recent one, in this continuous exchange.
And below this letter we publish two extra items that are relevant to this subject.
To the Human Rights Commission
27 July, 2015
Dear Mr. Wilson,
Further to our letters challenging mandatory vaccinations for employment and government welfare benefits I would like to present you with a global update on the serious damage the HPV vaccine is causing globally. I have also provided the incomplete scientific evidence from the medical journals that the claims of safety and efficacy have been based on. Please see below for this information that I have provided to the subscribers of my newsletter because the mainstream Australian media will not present it.
I would also like to add that it is extremely concerning that in your role as Human Rights Commissioner you have ignored the international covenants that protect the right to informed consent without coercion in all medical interventions. This is particularly important for vaccination which is a procedure for healthy people.
Your response that ‘no-one is being forced to take a vaccine, therefore there is not a human rights violation’ (23 June 2015) does not address the issues I am presenting and it is disappointing that a HR Commissioner would provide this response to the public. The issue is about voluntary consent to a medical intervention without ‘pressure, coercion or manipulation’ as stated in section 2.1.3 in the Australian Immunisation Handbook. This right is also protected under the ‘right to privacy’ in the International Covenant on Economic and Cultural and Social Rights (ICECSR).
Please could you explain why you have not acknowledged the concerns I have presented regarding our right to ‘informed consent without coercion’ in your response. This right is protected in the Good Practice Medical Guidelines for Australian doctors and the Declaration of Geneva that was established by the World Medical Association in 1948.
The Declaration of Geneva states:
“I will not use my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat.”
The concerned community would like a response from the HRC that addresses these issues and discusses the international covenants that protect our human rights. Please read the information in the newsletter below to see the global debate about the dangers of HPV vaccination and the risks that mandatory vaccination pose to population health.
Newsletter 75 HPV Global Vaccination Program Update
Since the global introduction of HPV vaccines in 2007, as a prevention for cervical cancer, there have been many serious adverse reactions to this vaccine that have not been reported in the mainstream Australian media. Court action for these victims has begun in France, India, Spain,and Japan. Many other countries such as Denmark, Columbia, Mexico, Brazil, Scotland and Ireland are debating the value of this vaccine. Japan has stopped recommending this vaccine in their national immunisation program due to serious adverse events and deaths. This vaccine is an experimental vaccine that has not been proven safe, effective or necessary in the prevention of cervical cancer yet the Australian media is not reporting this debate. Here is an article in the medical journal Infectious Agents and Cancer that explains why this vaccine is only an experimental vaccine and is not yet proven to be safe or effective in preventing cervical cancer.
The Petitions Committee for the Scottish Parliament is currently calling for comments and signatures regarding the need for a scientific meeting in Edinburgh to discuss the safety of HPV vaccines. This is an opportunity to give a voice to injured people from all over the world as well as anyone who is concerned about the promotion of this vaccine in national immunisation programs. The closing date for comments and signatures for support of this proposed meeting in Edinburgh is 21 August 2015. Here is a link to the Scottish Petitions Committee to provide your support to the meeting that will discuss the risks and benefits of HPV vaccines globally. Please leave a brief comment or signature stating your support for this public forum that will allow scientists and medical professionals to debate the use of HPV vaccines. Here is a link to the progress of the lawsuit facing Bill Gates regarding the ethical violations of the trials of the HPV vaccine carried out in India in 2009 – trials that were conducted after the vaccine had been introduced into many countries national immunisation programs in 2007.
Public health is put at risk if medical interventions such as vaccination cannot be openly debated in public forums and if the risks of vaccines are not being presented in the mainstream media..
Editor’s Note: We now publish an article furnished to us by the Sanevax organisation which has devoted its resources to publicising stories of those who have experienced vaccine damage first hand.
This one concerns the HPV vaccine.
It is also a vaccine I would personally advise any of my close family members not to have, even though it appears on the mandatory vaccine list by the Australian government.
By Simona from Rome, Italy
Gardasil in Italy
My daughter Chiara is 13 years old. She was an athlete with a history of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis with elevated levels of anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies. We discovered it much before receiving HPV vaccine.
I can tell you that she was a good athlete. Hashimoto’s did not stop her from participating in the World Championship Karate in Caorle twice. In 2010, she won the brown belt. Chiara’s other hobbies included painting, singing and practicing sports. That was before Gardasil.
Chiara’s story after Gardasil is as follows:
She received the first injection of the HPV vaccine Gardasil in March 2013. It was about ten days before her menstrual cycle. Afterward, she was sick for three days showing nausea, headache, stomach-ache and faint.
In April 2013 she was again sick for five days but the doctor said that could be just a strong menstrual syndrome.
In May 2013 she received the second shot and she was sick again for seven days.
During June 2013 she stayed sick for ten days.
By July 2013 she had an osteocondrite (a joint condition whereby a variable amount of bone and its adjacent cartilage loses its blood supply) at her astragalus (ankle) so she had to stop practicing sports. We contacted the gynecologist and she suggested to give her magnesium.
On September 2013 after the third shot, she started to have seriously strong stomachaches, like an acute allergic reaction. She did endoscopic exams, but all negative. She was treated with proton-pump inhibitors and she followed a diet without milk and derivatives, but no success.
In December 2013 she started to experience vasovagal syncope with strong stomachaches, headaches and insomnia.
During January 2014 she was kept in hospital for ten days, she repeated the endoscopic exam, and they found some eosinophil cells (eosinophilic esophagitis is an allergic inflammatory condition of the esophagus) and low levels of vitamin D.
During February 2014 she started to take vitamin D, B1, B6, B12, selenium. She started feeling better but, the heavy pain, insomnia and syncope episodes did not stop.
During the 2013-2014 school year, she missed more than 90 day of classroom for the above pains and symptoms.
In July 2014 the endocrinologist/gynecologist suspected endometriosis and decided to give her a contraceptive (Claire), but through NMR analysis everything appeared negative.
Although we brought Chiara to several medical doctors only one, a gynecologist, suggested that everything could be related to Gardasil treatments. All the others to which we talked about this idea treated us like mad people.
I have read several articles, but I am very impressed with one by Lloyd W. Phillip (Gardasil Syndrome). I think I have finally realized what happened my daughter.
At the moment she is taking selenium, magnesium, vitamin D, B1, B6, B12, melatonin and live lactic cultures. Although all the celiac tests were negative we discovered that celiac diet and low level of histamine related food seems to have some positive results.
The gynecologist changed her contraceptive with a stronger one to stop the menstrual cycle flow.
In the last month she is doing better, she had just one episode of syncope, less pain and the number of normal days have increased.
The syncope episodes seem to be related to her menstrual cycle, in particular the worse days are those overlapping with ovulation and menstruation days.
After two years she was finally able to go to school for two consecutive weeks. Before, she could not eat without vomiting, study or sleep. Meeting her friends for a day out was nearly impossible.
I wrote my daughter’s story to give you an idea about the injuries that Gardasil could cause. I hope our experience could help you decide to investigate before you decide to use an HPV vaccine.
Above all, I hope Chiara and all the other survivors of new medical conditions after HPV vaccinations find treatments to help them get their normal lives back.
Editor’s Note: Sharyl Atkisson is a US journalist who runs a blog specialising in news that is not covered by the US mainstream media.
One of her major focus issue is that of safe vaccination.
Australia suffers the same frustrating press distortions similar to the US, as Australian researcher, Judy Wileyman, has discovered.
Maybe this should not be surprising as Rupert Murdoch is a dominant player in the US and controls about 70 percent of Australia’s media.
The Murdoch Press is also a supporter of the coalition in Australia, as many pharmacists discovered to their surprise, when the biased media coverage surrounding 6CPA commenced, and which has now moderated to a significant degree since 6CPA negotiations have been concluded.
“A current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) senior scientist has made an unprecedented admission: he and his colleagues–he says– committed scientific misconduct to cover up a meaningful link between vaccines and autism in black boys.
Just as startling, the CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, says the study co-authors “scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room, and reviewed and went through all the hardcopy documents that we had thought we should discard, and put them into a huge garbage can.”
The…co-authors…brought a big garbage can into the meeting room… [and put the documents]…into a huge garbage can. –CDC Senior Scientist Dr. William Thompson
Despite this whistleblower testimony, which Dr. Thompson provided to Rep. Bill Posey, R-Florida, there is little chance of a meaningful hearing or investigation.
In an untainted news environment, the allegations would make headlines in most legitimate publications and would trigger federal inquiries. However, the interests of the powerful pharmaceutical industry reach deeply into Congress and the news media through lobbyists, propaganda and advertising dollars.
The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. –CDC Senior Scientist Dr. William Thompson
That’s why Congressman Posey resorted to simply reading some of Dr. Thompson’s statement today on the House floor…including the part in which Dr. Thompson says he retained the evidence that had been thrown in the garbage can, in the unlikely event that a neutral investigative or scientific body would like to see it today.
“[B]ecause I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] and DOJ [Department of Justice] requests, I kept hardcopies of all documents in my office, and I retain all associated computer files,” Posey quotes Dr. Thompson as reporting.
The CDC and Thompson’s co-author Dr. Frank DeStefano, CDC Director of Immunization Safety, have defended the controversial study as originally published. Dr. DeStefano explains why here in detail.
One final note: Rep. Posey unequivocally states that he is pro-vaccine. However, the propaganda campaign typically falsely portrays anyone who addresses vaccine safety issues as “anti-vaccine.”
For more, visit Sharyl’s site.