The Safe Vaccine Debate – 1. Dr Judy Wilyman: Newsletters #203 and #204 2. AVN: Two children die in Samoa minutes after MMR vaccination 3. GreenMedInfo: NVIC Tracking 134 Vaccine Bills Introduced in 35 States

1. Dr Judy Wilyman: Newsletters #203 and #204

Newsletter 203 Conference: The Censorship of the Vaccination Debate in Australia
8 July 2016

When the above billboard was put up in Perth on 13 June 2018 the Australian Medical Association (AMA) lobbied the WA government to remove this billboard stating it was “a risk to public health” and the WA health minister permitted the billboard to be removed one week after it was put up.
Yet the opposite of this statement is true – public health is at risk if the public does not know what is in a vaccine.
The public and the government cannot protect the public’s interest in public policy without knowing what is in a vaccine and the effects of these chemicals on the genetics of the population.
So why has the WA “Health” Minister, Roger Cook, permitted this billboard to be removed when it is clearly not in the public interest to do so?

This suppression of the medical literature is occurring with the compliance of the government due to the conflicts of interest in the funding of government vaccine advisory boards and the drug regulator (eg. our 100% industry-funded government regulator – the TGA) and individuals on vaccine advisory boards.

It is also due to the professional regulations of health practitioners set by the Medical Board of Australia (MBA) that ensure doctors are de-registered if they discuss the risks of vaccines (“anti-vaccination material”) with their patients.
This is a breach of the medical oath (the Declaration of Geneva) that all Australian doctors take prior to practicing medicine: an oath that states they will put their patient’s best interest first.

Coercive vaccination policies such as the No Jab No Pay/Play policies and employment policies that require Australians to have multiple vaccines in order to be employed or receive welfare benefits serve the government’s interest and not the public’s interest in public health policy.

Public health policy can be used to protect corporate interests in public health policy if the prinicples of health promotion – honesty, autonomy of doctors, objective science and the precautionary principle – are not used in the design of these policies.

In Australia these principles are not being used to design public health policy and therefore the current coercive vaccination policies cannot protect human health.
The policies are designed to protect corporate interests in government policy and this is described in my presentation at the recent conference on the censorship of the vaccination debate in Sydney (30 June 2018).

Here is a link to my 30 min presentation describing why “Australia’s coercive vaccinationpolicies cannot protect human health”.

Australia’s coercive NJNPay/Play policies cannot protect human health because the are not founded on the ethical guidelines for health promotion or the international codes for human rights on medical practices.
And they do not consider the genetics of the population.

I have provided an in-depth discussion of these human rights breaches in my webinar for the Australian Naturopathic Practitioner’s Association (ANPA) titled “Informed Consent to Vaccination: Current Issues in Australia”

Please also view Elizabeth Hart’s 30 min presentation of the web of conflicts of interest in the government’s vaccination policies that have resulted in biased pharmaceutical researchbeing used in the government’s discriminatory social welfare policies.
This has resulted in an institutional bias in Australia’s political system that is endangering human health.

For more details of the lack of rigour in the science underpinning coercive vaccination policies please read Chatper’s 6 and 8 of my PhD thesis that describes the causality studies that have not been funded by the government to prove that vaccines are safe and effective.
My PhD thesis published by the University of Wollongong provides evidence that Australian politicians are lying to the Australian public about vaccines.

This false information provided to politicians by well funded lobby groups can only be sustained by not debating my university research and by smearing my reputation.
Both of these things have been permitted in Australia and the University of Wollongong has not been required to have policies that protect my reputation in public debates of my research.  

The Medical Board of Australia (MBA) and the Australian government cannot claim that the NJNPay/Play and employment policies are “protective” health policies because children’s health has declined significantly with the expansion of the government’s vaccination program.
The 5-fold increase in chronic illness and exponential increase in autism that has occurred with the expansion of the schedule cannot be ignored and “coincidence” is not an acceptable response.

The program has been implemented and the MBA has not been required to provide evidence that 95% vaccination rates for 16 vaccines will improve the health of the population.
This amounts to an unmonitored experiment on a genetically diverse population   

The Australian government is committing a crime against the Australian population because it has mandated the current vaccintion schedule of 16 vaccines (~45 – 52 doses of vaccine) for children when there is clear evidence that children’s health is declining with the expansion of this program. 

Newsletter 204 A Child in Australia Dies Three Hours After Receiving Six vaccines
15 July 2018

On 10 July 2017 (one year ago) an infant in Perth died three hours after receving 6 vaccines – including the Flu vaccine and MMR vaccine.
Did you read about this in the mainstream corporate-sponsored media?

The Perth doctor described the child’s presentation as “normal” even though the child had flu symptoms.
The doctor added the flu vaccine to his shots even though it is not on the national schedule for infants at 12 months.
The parents were told that he didn’t have a temperature so vaccinating for flu would be fine.

Three hours after receiving the 6 vaccines on 10 July 2017 – including Flu vaccine and MMR – the child died and the coroner stated months later that this was due to an “unknown health problem” – chronic heart defect (CHD). 

The parents have stated that CHD was never detected at any stage of prenatal ultrsounds or at the time of discharge after delivery at the hospital. CHD was never discussed with the parents prior to the death.

Vaccines are being ignored as the cause of death in these cases even though it is known that the ingredients of vaccines are linked to severe allergies, chronic autoimmune diseases, autism and death.
And even though these illnesses are escalating in all highly vaccinated populations.

Can this be described as a “protective” public health policy by the Australian government and Medical Board of Australia (MBA) when diseases / deaths in children are increasing and not declining?
And when governments are being allowed to ignore these skyrocketing illnesses and deaths in children?  

In Australia the MBA considers that “hidden health problems” are an acceptable explanation for deaths and illnesses that occur after vaccination.
They are doing this by ignoring the medical literature that demonstrates that the ingredients of vaccines are causing these diseases and that they will affect people differently according to their genetic-makeup.
Quack science is being used to underpin coercive and mandatory vaccination policies in Australia.

This is why the vaccination debate in Australia is being censored.  

Now we hear of two deaths to MMR vaccine in Samoa and the MMR vaccine has been removed from the market in Samoa. Australian doctors are going over to Samoa to do the autopsies on these children.
I wonder what they will find?

Currently the mainstream Australian media is promoting influenza vaccine to 5 year olds based on the apparent death of a child in Australia to the flu virus yet there has been no coverage of the death of this child in Perth – a death that occured 3 hours after receiving 6 vaccines at the same time in July 2017.

Similalrly the Australian media has not mentioned the 1000’s of adverse events including 100’s of convulsions, seizures and permanent disability / death of children to flu vaccine in Australia in 2009 / 2010.
This occurred one year after the West Australian government had trialled the influenza vaccine in WA children in 2008 with a fear campaign in the media.

After these severe reactions to CSL’s H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine in 2010 (promoted in media fear campaigns as the ‘swine-flu’ vaccine), the children’s flu vaccine was removed from the Australian market and investigated by the same team of researchers that trialled and promoted this ‘H1N1 swine-flu’ vaccine to the public in 2008 / 9.
A significant confilct of interest. 

Now, in 2018, the Australian health department and media are promoting another H1N1 flu vaccine to children and all this history is being ignored by the health department, the MBA and the media.
Our media, government and the Medical Board of Australia are indoctrinating the public with false and misleading information about vaccines and infectious diseases.

This is a political situation resulting from the conflicts of interest in institutions that has produced an institutional bias in the medical literature that is being used to educate politicians, journalists and the public.

This is why I have informed parents in my latest presentation at the Censorship of the Vaccination Debate in Sydney (30 June 2018) that you do not need a medical degree to make a decision about using vaccines.

This is a political situation and the Australian government has violated the Nuremberg Code by mandating with coercive financial bribes – to doctors and parents – this medical procedure that is described by governments ‘as unavoidably unsafe’.
This is clearly a policy that will result in serious harm to many people in genetically diverse populations and this is why Sweden, Columbia and now Italy will not be adopting mandatory vaccination policies.

Here is a link to my presentation titled ‘Is this a ‘Protective’ Public Health Policy’ that describes why the Australian government’s unlawful social welfare policies that mandate 16 vaccines in a genetically diverse population cannot protect human health. 


2. AVN: Two children die in Samoa minutes after MMR vaccination

Ministry of Health orders all MMR vaccines seized and an immediate investigation to commence

News has just emerged that two one-year old children died within minutes of receiving the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccination in the villages of Safatou and Sasina in Samoa.
The deaths took place three days ago on the 6th of July.
The family of the first child told reporters that their daughter, Lannacallystah Samuelu, was dead only 3 minutes after the nurse administered the vaccine.
The family of another one-year-old, Lameko Siu, heard of Lannacallystah’s death which had occurred just two hours earlier.
As a result, the mother refused vaccination for fear that her son would suffer a similar fate.
Ignoring the wishes of this family, the hospital nurse administered the vaccine and within a minute, this child was also dead.
Vaccines seized – investigation ordered
The Samoan Minister of Health has ordered all MMR vaccines in the country to be seized and a full investigation to commence immediately.
This tragedy highlights the real risks vaccinations can and do pose to both children and adults.
Due to Australia’s current coercive vaccination policies of No Jab No Pay/No Play, there are many families who are also being pushed against their will to vaccinate even though they fear it may harm or even kill their children.
Tasha David, AVN President and a person of Samoan descent, is horrified by this situation.
“It is well described in the medical literature that indigenous communities can be far more vulnerable to harm caused by vaccination.
Six of my eight children are vaccine injured and my family’s situation is not uncommon.
Yet the Government of Australia wants to force us to place our children in harm’s way – just as the hospital in Samoa harmed these children.
“Our hearts go out to these families!
We hope the investigation will be a prompt and honest one and that justice will prevail.
The AVN is passionate about the health of all children and their families.
All we ask is for our own informed health choices to be respected.” 

Lannacallystah Samuelu, a little girl who celebrated her first birthday only a week before tragically dying just minutes after receiving the MMR vaccine.









Lameko Siu, a one-year old boy who was vaccinated against the wishes of his mother and who died just one minute later.

3. GreenMedInfo: NVIC Tracking 134 Vaccine Bills Introduced in 35 States

A tidal wave of new bills has flooded 35 states in the U.S., threatening to either limit or completely eradicate vaccine exemptions.
Clearly health freedom and informed consent is undergoing full frontal assualt right now.
Please read, share, and take action accordingly.  

In 2015 California signed into law the highly contested Senate Bill 277 (SB277) accomplishing two outcomes. First, the bill eliminated the personal belief exemption for vaccination. Second, the bill’s actionable directives served as a sobering wake up call that mobilized the public and medical community to enter the fight for an evaporating health freedom and informed consent.

Yet, despite multiple whistleblowers within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) spotlighting research corruption and pharmaceutical industry collusion, over $3 billion dollars paid out in vaccine damages by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, widespread vaccine contamination, and overall ineffectiveness and dangers of the current vaccine schedule there has now been 134 vaccine bills introduced in 35 states in the first seven weeks of the US legislative session.

Breaking: NVIC Tracking 134 Vaccine Bills Introduced in 35 States


According to the National Vaccine Information Center’s (NVIC) Advocacy Team who track vaccine-related bills, 31 new bills have been added since the team’s last update two weeks prior.
Eight of these new bills are in five states appearing for the first time.
The coordinated legislative push represents nothing short of a full frontal onslaught by pharmaceutical companies, working through their lobbied politicians, to force dangerous vaccine products upon the backs of the entire US population.

Looking deeper into the tidal wave of vaccine-related legislation sees eight states, deemed “priority opposition alert states” by NVIC, proposing bills to restrict or eliminate vaccine exemptions altogether. Similar to California’s new normal thanks to SB277, legislators in Connecticut, Iowa, Minnesota, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Utah are now hoping to remove and impede pillars of health freedom and parental choice.

The Slippery Slope of Legalized Persecution

Perhaps the most disturbing trend and telling takeaway from this new surge of vaccine-related bills within the US is the clear move to legally persecute those choosing to not vaccinate.
The new structure to implement vaccine persecution is appearing in two different forms.
First, Connecticut, Idaho, Kansas, Massachusetts, Montana, New York, Texas, and Utah have filed bills to expand vaccine tracking or eliminate opt-in consent for vaccine tracking. Second, Arizona, Connecticut, Nevada, New York, Oklahoma, Texas, and Utah have filed bills that would allow ‘school shaming’ by requiring and normalizing the public disclosure of vaccination and exemption rates.
Nevada has gone one step further than the rest by introducing AB 200 allowing parents to find out from the school if any children who are not vaccinated are attending.

In the current atmosphere of increasing persecution of those who exercise their medical choice, public disclosure by law opens the gates to community-driven discrimination at all levels, endless local and national media harassment, and mounting pressure on local health professionals to increase community vaccination rates at all costs. If passed and signed into law, Arkansas Senate Bill 301 will allow health departments to share personal information in the immunization registry.
In the past, families and their children who wished to exercise their right to health freedom and not vaccinate have endured an increasing trend of vilification by the corporate media, mainstream medical profession, school systems, and the public at large.
The recent trend has also seen doctors refuse to treat patients, or kick them out of their practice, for not being vaccinated and/or not signing their in-house “immunization contracts.”
Corporate media has myopically focused on the dangers unvaccinated people pose to the ‘herd’ while willfully censoring epidemic rates of autism spectrum disorders, documented vaccine dangers, and multiple CDC whistleblowers warning of research fraud and pharmaceutical industry collusion. 

A look back at the government, medical, and media talking points over the recent years has seen a three-part progression bringing the public to the current, openly admitted, stage of green lighting the establishment persecution of the unvaccinated.
At first, the message was to simply vaccinate to prevent disease.
Due to multifactorial events, the original messaging fell out of favor and was changed to ‘vaccinate to protect others.’
The ‘protect others’ collective approach symbolized a giant leap away from the individual and their health freedom while attempting to put ‘herd immunity’ and the greater good front and center to neutralize personal choice.
We have now officially entered a third turning which has historically alarming consequences.
Persecution, written into law, of groups of people for their beliefs goes well beyond the once slippery slope the health freedom community found themselves on in the past.
The two-pronged approach of increased tracking and monitoring of unvaccinated individuals along with social and legal momentum to denounce the unvaccinated as threats to society and life itself are simply reprehensible and historically chilling.

Connecticut, Texas, and Utah have introduced new bills that require families that utilize vaccine exemptions to participate in a state-sponsored vaccine (re)eduction program.
The discriminatory and presumptuous bills assume that those who exert their medical and parental choice are uneducated and ignorant.
For the increasing populations of people that believe in health freedom and understand that vaccines are not necessarily safe or effective, attempted bills to force “education” are a sign that pharmaceutical companies and their paid/lobbied mouthpieces have lost control of the narrative and messaging.

Increased Targeting of Doctors

Doctors will not be immune from the targeted persecution. In California, where SB277 is law, the 2015-2016 Annual Report of the Medical Board of California officially states:

The Board will investigate any complaints in which a physician may not be following the standard of care…

Individual physicians will face a new angle of pressure to meet the “standard of care” as new bills are introduced to track, share, and publish vaccination data as well as restrict or eliminate vaccine exemptions.
The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) collects data and issues “report cards on health plans which meet “important standards of care.”
Put simply, The NCQA ratings for health plans are partly dependent upon their ability to deliver pharmaceutical products.
If the new bills chronicled by NVIC are signed into law, doctors wishing to allow vaccine choice or using their medical judgement in cases involving vaccine waivers may face a medical board investigation from their respective state.
In addition, health plans being rated by the NCQA will likely put pressure on participating doctors who are not fully vaccinating all their patients.
The good news is that doctors are now uniting to oppose mandatory vaccination laws, and educate the public on infectious disease, the immune system, and informed consent as seen with the recently formed group Physicians for Informed Consent

Good News for Health Freedom

The NVIC Advocacy Team also gave good news by listing and encouraging support for new bills filed in Hawaii, Iowa, Indiana, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and West Virginia that will add or expand vaccine exemptions.
As the tide continues to turn, the public is witnessing bills that are not pharmaceutically driven showing that some legislators and authors behind such bills do indeed stand for their constituents.
Due to activist who are doing the leg work legislators are listening to their constituents, accepting their documents and materials, and using their arguments on the floor to debate.

NVIC launched the vaccine safety and informed consent movement in America in the early 1980s and is the oldest and largest consumer led organization advocating for the institution of vaccine safety and informed consent protections in the public health system.
Their Advocacy Team is doing the vital work of continuously monitoring newly introduced bills and their movements.
It is recommended that those interested in alerts of new vaccine-related legislation and contact information to engage with their state’s decision makers and legislators sign up for free at the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

Written By: Jefferey Jaxen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *