8 Comments on The Safe Vaccination Debate – Dr Judy Wilyman Reports

  1. Bev Pattenden // March 7, 2017 at 1:04 am // Reply

    I have been researching vaccines for 20 years and the more you study the more you hate them. I have hundreds of friends of facebook who have lost their babies to vaccines, their lives been ruined where they have children 20 years of age still non verbal and in nappies, and many severely brain damaged with the ability of a 2 years old and the body of an adult. It is just so shocking this cannot be allowed to continue. Vaccines are now demonic, based on lies, non existent science and population reduction agenda agenda. It’s over.

  2. C Blackledge // March 7, 2017 at 1:21 am // Reply

    Thank you so much for speaking out. I first became concerned about childhood vaccines in 1994 when a UK doctor dared to speak out about his concerns about MMR and possible links to bowel problems and autism. They are tried to discredit him and no one since has really had a strong enough voice and credentials to stand up for the general public who have concerns. So a big thank you and best wishes for what you are trying to do.

  3. Judy, I’m glad someone in this country is defending truth in science. When skeptics question government, they’re ‘dangerous’. When they question tyranny, they’re ‘conspiracy theorists’. When they question vaccine safety and efficacy data (lack thereof) they are lampooned as disease-promoting, irresponsibly anti-social gullible to quackery idiots. When the vaccine profiteers open their books, their safety and efficacy study and trial data to peer review and other forms of ethical scrutiny considered in ‘normal’ science as, well, ‘normal’, I’ll lend them half an ear. Until then, they should shut up or put up. Simple?

  4. Daniel Taylor // March 8, 2017 at 5:52 am // Reply

    All attempts to gain the data, aka risk assesment reports, to support the statement, “the benefits outweigh the risks”, have failed and been met with silence or referral elsewhere. What do I do ?

  5. There are no risk assessments for vaccines because the government has never evaluated the health outcomes of using all these vaccines. The government uses mathematical models with assumptions to decide whether to add a new vaccine to the schedule. Here is a link to my PhD that concludes that the benefits do not outweigh the risks. This is clear if you investigate the reasons why the deaths and illnesses to infectious declined in the mid-twentieth century and that every prominent public health official of the 20th century stated that this decline occurred prior to the introduction of mass vaccination campaigns. Children’s health has declined significantly as each new vaccine was added and this is clear evidence of the harm this program is causing. Government’s are stating that the ‘benefits outweigh the risks’ without any supportive evaluation and even as children’s health is clearly declining. You might like to read the conclusion of my PhD http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4541/

  6. Re the news link to ‘Unintended Health Cosnequences for Too Little Gluten in the Diet’ – too often such stories (like the one on ABC’s ‘The Checkout’ some time back) steer consumers with the equivalent of PR using science for credibility in the same way big pharma relies on Doctor-Patient relationship and trust to flog their wares. This story fails to mention the gliadin issue (see GreenMedInfo.com) and the fact that the wheat being mass produced today does not compare to that to our forefathers ate – to which we have some genetic adaption. They neglect to mention Glyphosate (active agent in RoundUp)that is sprayed not only for theoretical pest control but prior to harvest to dessicate it. Check out the MSDS on that online. It damages the shikamate pathway of our gut microflora – our gut, including our gut biome – is our second brain (see Dr Perlmutter’s book ‘Grain Brain’) and suppresses Cytochrome P450 Enzymes – all critical to health and immunity. See YTube vids (Mercola and Seneff on shikamate pathway and a review in ‘entrop’- open access – at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy by S. Seneff & A.Samsel”Glyphosate’s Suppression of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Amino Acid Biosynthesis by the Gut Microbiome:Pathways to Modern Diseases”). Nor does this article mention there are MANY healthier sources of dietary fibre in abundance that don’t come with all the baggage – wheat is a poor source – or the fact that processed foods (aka bread and other plastic food-like-substances) are scientifically known to be incompatible with human (or other animal) physiology and biochemistry. If I eat any form of wheat it must be the ancient varieties, organic (no glyphosate),stoneground wholegrain and very minimal (biodynamic raw vegan and/or wholefood organic ketogenic diet mostly for brain and body extreme health).

    Just saying – I think links like this (PR science) should come with a warning and some material to balance them. Just IMHO. Too many sick people getting bad advice from big food, big pharma, big government etc.

    Regarding: Gluten-free diet may have ‘unintended consequences’ for health

  7. The nuclear & vaccine industrial complexes have something in common. Governments have deemed them untouchable, without any liability. In other words, they have been given a ‘licence to kill.’

  8. Robert Leslie Phillips // May 20, 2017 at 9:29 am // Reply

    I believe that all children at birth should be registered for vaccinations to cover all confirmed diseases They should also be implanted with etag containing name blood group and religion information

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*