1. Jon Rappoport: Europe under the vaccination gun: an expanding tragedy
Robert F Kennedy Jr. and the World Mercury Project have a report:
“European Union (EU) residents have less confidence in vaccine safety than people in any other region in the world.
From the perspective of the powerful pharmaceutical industry and its bought politicians, this growing skepticism about vaccine orthodoxy cannot be permitted to gain further momentum.”
“Ignoring massive protests by citizens and municipal authorities, the governments of France, Italy and other EU nations (with the help of Big-Pharma lobbyists) have begun methodically and paternalistically proposing and/or enacting new vaccine laws. These laws aim to erase any remaining ability for citizens to weigh risk-benefit information and make vaccine decisions for themselves.”
“And now, the European Parliament (the EU’s law-making body) has thrown its considerable weight into the fray to promote EU-wide coordination of vaccination policies and programs.
Not content to let vaccination policy remain ‘a competence of national authorities,’ the Parliament’s committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted a resolution in March 2018 to promote stricter policies both ‘within and outside the EU.’ To carry out this aim, the European Commission (the EU’s executive arm) will present, in 2018, a Joint Action to increase vaccination coverage and address ‘vaccine hesitancy’.”
“According to a commentary on the resolution in The British Medical Journal (BMJ), European Parliament members are unwilling to brook any dissent, characterizing all licensed vaccines as safe and dismissing information to the contrary as ‘unreliable, misleading and unscientific.’
A query that one might legitimately pose in return, however, is whether massive lobbying by the pharmaceutical industry has rendered parliamentarians incapable of impartiality.”
The EU-Pharma claw is squeezing tighter.
The citizens of Europe are in the grip. Freedom of choice is at stake. Health is at stake.
The official iron-fisted stance on vaccines—“safe and effective beyond question or doubt”—is fascism personified.
The EU will not back down.
Therefore, the answer is: exit the EU.
Leave it in the dust.
The EU vision of a United Europe is the old Nazi plan in a new suit.
First came the common market, which eventually morphed into a political framework of governance of European nations from above.
That is now a reality.
As predicted by many analysts, this structure—friendly and encouraging on the surface—has enacted a tidal wave of rules and regulations to choke the population.
And now, injection of toxic substances (e.g., aluminum, formaldehyde) in the bodies of millions.
If the EU has its way.
Take your shots.
“The science is settled.”
One of Europe’s most important 20th-century political analysts, Ivan Illich, wrote these explosive words in 1977: “The combined death rate from scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization.
In part, this recession may be attributed to improved housing and to a decrease in the virulence of micro-organisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition.” (Medical Nemesis, Bantam Books)
Illich is only one of the many critics of vaccination the EU has studiously chosen to ignore, in its pursuit of establishing a pharmaceutical empire.
The EU also chooses to trample on freedom without a second thought—on its own continent, where once a struggle of centuries birthed freedom in the West.
2. Robert Kennedy’s World Mercury Project: CDC Still Paralyzed by Autism Epidemic: Report Shows One in 59 Children in the US Now Affected
By World Mercury Project Team
Yesterday, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) released the latest autism spectrum disorder (ASD) prevalence estimate from its Autism and Developmental Disabilities (ADDM) network.
Among children born in 2006, in the 11 states included in the report, ASD prevalence at age eight was one in 59 children.
In the early 1980s, only 35 years ago, the rate of autism was about one in 5000.
That means that autism is about 85 times more common in today’s middle schoolers than it was in their parents.
That is why nobody who grew up back then knew a child with autism but today everyone does.
CDC’s complete lack of urgency regarding autism is reflected in the fact that the agency did not even bother to hold a press conference on the report.
Instead, CDC repeats the same tired rhetoric that they are concerned, that they need to diagnose children earlier for services and that better diagnosis (this time of minorities) accounts for the increase.
We need an institute that will address the childhood epidemics facing our country with real action now!
The CDC report might as well be saying that one in 59 children has a hangnail for all the concern CDC expresses, when in fact, this is a public health disaster that will have repercussions for generations.
At what point is the CDC going to admit that this disaster requires action?
The largest amount by far of research dollars spent on determining causation has been directed towards genetics.
“Genes don’t cause epidemics, environmental toxins do,” said World Mercury Project chair Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
“Why is the CDC doing nothing to identify the environmental toxins responsible for the most cataclysmic epidemic of our era?”
Watch this two minute WMP video, AUTISM EPIDEMIC: 1 in 59 Children. CDC Remains Paralyzed, to understand that the CDC has failed the public and the children of this country, and that we must act NOW to stop the autism epidemic.
World Mercury Project calls for the following concrete actions:
Immediately create a dedicated and independent agency for autism.
- It is time to remove autism from the jurisdiction of an agency that gives it no attention or priority.
In 2007, the CDC autism budget was $14 million, and ASDs affected one in 150 children.
Ten years later, in 2017, CDC’s autism budget was $23 million and ASDs affected one in 59 —a 250% increase.
If the rate of blindness in children had increased 250% in a decade, it would make front page headlines for weeks.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) classifies approximately 600,000 children in the school system as having autism.
By way of comparison, CDC spent $394 million in 2017 on 1085 reported cases of Zika virus.
Fix the inadequacies of the current surveillance system under new leadership.
- Compared to the previous 2016 report from the 2004 birth cohort, the new ADDM report eliminates two states and adds two new states.
Meanwhile, some of the participating states reduced their surveillance areas, while several states increased their access to educational records.
These inconsistencies between reports make it difficult—or impossible—to compare changes over time meaningfully.
If you consider the three states that have been consistently monitored and that have full access to educational records (Georgia, Maryland and New Jersey), the prevalence of autism is actually one in 46 children or 2.16%.
The lack of rigor in these reports is unacceptable.
Plan surveillance in the 33 states that have never been included in the ADDM network or come up with a representative sampling method.
- The ADDM network has never counted autism cases in Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington or Wyoming.
This means that CDC has never investigated three of the five most populous states (California, Texas and New York).
In addition, most of the surveillance takes place in only part of each state.
Overall, CDC surveillance covers only about 8% of American eight-year-olds. In comparison, last month’s Canadian ASD prevalence study covered 40% of five-17 year-olds.
We need to know what is going on in the rest of the country.
Confirm the long-term autism epidemic through additional studies of older birth cohorts.
- For a decade, CDC has downplayed the importance of its own findings and speculated that the exponential rise in autism prevalence is simply due to better and broader diagnosis.
The simple way to disprove this nonsense is to use Medicaid or insurance data on autism nationwide to count the qualifying cases for every birth cohort.
Medicaid eligibility is quite stringent; while it will not include the more able adults, it will include the majority of those with Autistic Disorder and show a trajectory over time.
This is straightforward and should have been done 20 years ago.
Since CDC has refused to look, it is time to hand this project to someone who will.
Continue to report autism prevalence using both DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 criteria.
- The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is the handbook that health professionals use to make diagnoses, and the most recent version (DSM-5) changed the criteria used to make an ASD diagnosis compared to the prior version (DSM-IV-TR).
In its latest ADDM report, CDC shows a 4% decrease in ASDs when using the new DSM-5 criteria compared to the older DSM-IV-TR criteria used for all previous ADDM reports.
However, the DSM-5 allows children to be “grandfathered” in—meaning that children who had a previous ASD diagnosis under DSM-IV-TR automatically are given a diagnosis of autism under DSM-5.
CDC’s report indicates that 15% of the children who met the criteria for DSM-5 only qualified based on having a previously established DSM-IV-TR diagnosis.
This suggests that in future years we will see a large drop in ASDs purely due to different criteria for counting cases, which is consistent with studies that have compared the two sets of diagnostic criteria.
This will only further confuse any analysis of long-term trends in autism.
CDC’s unthinking response to this ongoing concern is that they will use the DSM-5 criteria starting with the 2016 surveillance year and will apply the DSM-IV-TR criteria in a “limited geographic area to offer additional data for comparison.”
This is analogous to counting breast cancer cases for 20 years, reporting huge increases, then changing what types you are counting and being unconcerned about how that affects the trend.
Given the critical importance of autism prevalence data for the planning of educational and support needs, the surveillance should continue under both sets of DSM criteria in all states for several more cycles.
New leadership needs to address this now.
The CDC is Paralyzed.
The bottom line is that, notwithstanding all of the factors that are (intentionally or otherwise) muddying the waters, the CDC is paralyzed.
ASDs are being diagnosed at alarming rates in American children.
The agency’s complete lack of urgency regarding autism is an insult to the individuals and families affected.
More energy and resources must be dedicated immediately to finding autism’s causes and preventing future cases.
World Mercury Project is asking all to join our movement to demand that autism be removed from the CDC.
We need an institute that will address the childhood epidemics facing our country with real action now!
3. Vactruth: Why Claims of Unvaccinated Flu Deaths Are Highly Deceptive
Vaccine Status Gas Lighting
The first point to keep in mind is that “unvaccinated” does not imply vaccine free history, it only means the individual did NOT receive this year’s seasonal influenza vaccine. 
Further, one must also ask: where is the evidence (data) that proves the vaccination status of these individuals?
We do not know the influenza vaccination history of the “unvaccinated” and the “vaccinated” individuals.
It is likely that this is the first time many in the ‘vaccinated’ group have received the flu shot, and the ‘unvaccinated’ group could have possibly received the flu shot in prior seasons (possibly many years). 
Why is this important?
Studies have demonstrated that seasonal influenza vaccine induces original antigenic sin — which means it selectively trains your body to produce an antibody response that will likely be worthless for the subsequent year’s influenza strain.
This is because your immune system “remembers” how it previously responded to a pathogen, and this memory can be quite detrimental if its response is incorrect toward different strains (poor training is worse than no training). Thus, people who receive the seasonal flu shot are at higher risk for contracting more virulent, pandemic strains of the influenza that could potentially be fatal. [2,3]
Flu Shot Suppresses Your Immune System
Conversely, natural immunity (contracting the influenza naturally and subsequently convalescing) enables your immune system to have “heterosubtypic immunity,” — that is, the ability to produce antibodies to various flu strains. Moreover, immunity is a multifaceted process that includes antibodies as one component of the overall response; natural exposure to pathogens engages all layers of the immune system (vaccines do not).
Thus, the putative unvaccinated individuals who died quite possibly received prior year(s) flu shots that incorrectly trained their immune system.
The flu vaccine is highly immunosuppressive – studies demonstrate that vaccinees have an increased susceptibility to infection. 
If you have received the flu shot last year, or multifarious times prior, your immune system is likely weaker this year.
No control for confounding variables in the data.
We do not have any information on the health statuses of the vaccinated and unvaccinated deaths. 
Is there healthy user bias interfering: have many in the unvaccinated group been injured by prior vaccines, therefore immuno-compromised, and more vulnerable to death?
What are the diets, vitamin D3 status, and further, other health seeking behaviors of each person?
Therefore, this statistical scare tactic (85% unvaccinated) is absolutely rendered useless when fastidiously examined.
In light of what the scientific literature imparts to us regarding the effects of vaccines on the immune system, it can be almost unequivocally guaranteed that the reason these individuals died from the flu was NOT because they avoided this year’s flu shot.
Of course, this assumes the CDC is being honest about the vaccination statuses of the flu victims, which may be a precarious assumption given prior history.
With that being said – in either case – the claims that the influenza vaccine is beneficial are uncorroborated by scientific data.
Safety is another integral concern as well, which deserves its own article.