At last the tide is turning against those dupes who have become paid mouthpieces for Big Pharma as their enormous program of duplicity begins to unravel.
Researchers like Australia’s Judy Wilyman have documented the facts.
But unconventional methods for spreading information for rational and open debate have had to be used because debate has been hindered by an unhealthy mainstream press, which has further abrogated its responsibilities as a platform of democracy and has not investigated vaccination claims and other drug claims.
Instead, it has become part of the problem by becoming corrupt, along with a major line up of other prominent players.
And so the “underground” Internet publishers have flourished and have become major news channels in their own right because they have become trusted through their factual delivery of news.
Jon Rappoport is one such exponent – an experienced investigative journalist with a background in mainstream media, but now alternative media.
i2P has also been proud to be part of the underground process.
Our vaccine policy has been very simple.
We are against unsafe vaccines and remain dubious about vaccines that are not supported with proper clinical evidence (and that is just about 95 percent of all vaccines).
We are totally against coercion of any description because we believe it is against the law and breaks at least six international treaties safeguarding people from being forced to ingest medications against their wishes.
And while we support the concept of pharmacists embracing vaccination as a community service we hope those giving the vaccines give a truthful and informed consent.
Otherwise you become part of the problem and the result will be a lower level of trust by patients of their pharmacists.
It affects us all.
Please note that some of Judy’s links may hit a “paywall”. Free access can be obtained by inserting appropriate keywords into a Google search engine.
As most of you are aware I have been studying the development of Australia’s vaccination policies for the last decade (firstly in the Faculty of Health and then the Faculty of Humanities (politics and ethics)) and attempting to debate this issue with respect to human rights and medical interventions. Yet there is no forum to debate my academic research and parents who attempt this debate are ridiculed and abused for requesting the evidence to support this policy. There is no need to attack the messenger, or suppress the debate, if government’s have the evidence to support their claims. The public is entitled to see all the data and the source of this data before making an informed decision on this issue.
I would like to draw your attention to this article in the Australian (17 April 2016) informing the public of the number of human rights that have been lost since 2013 including the right to choose (without coercion) what is injected into your own body and that of your children. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/faster-erosion-of-rights-threat-to-rule-of-law/news-story/675505ecb2eb7bbbcce6a6d16c943d83
In addition, the new Biosecurity bill was passed in 2014 that includes the directive that the ‘director can order someone to be vaccinated or treated’, that is, forced vaccination has been legalised. Here is the link to this information http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/may/13/anyone-suspected-of-having-ebola-would-face-quarantine-or-jail-under-new-powers
The issue with forced vaccinations is that disease statistics and ‘pandemics’ are being based on pharmaceutically funded research (see the link to my thesis in the letter below) so whilst the government’s justification for this legislation ‘appears’ to be a reasonable course of action it is not legislation that has been based on independent analysis of the data.
I hope that you will take the time to read my newsletter below and assist in getting this topic debated in public forums and in the mainstream media with accurate information. For those of you who have not followed the way in which mainstream journalists have been portraying my research please read these articles written by my supervisor at UOW http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/16jw.html and http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/16Loussikian.html
Again I apologise for the way in which I am bringing you this information but there are no public forums to discuss this issue in Australia. Some of you will remember how lobby groups prevented Dr. Sherri Tenpenny (a US medical doctor of many years experience) from speaking in Australia in February 2014
This author (who is not qualified in health) used spin not evidence to inform you that this medical doctor should not speak in Australia on this important health topic.
Please also see the link in the newsletter below to all the doctors who are speaking up on this topic and this article that describes how Andrew Wakefield’s research was falsely claimed to be ‘debunked’ https://idsent.wordpress.com/2015/04/14/the-mythical-debunking-of-andrew-wakefield/
Please forward this email to friends and family to ensure that there is a public debate of this issue using independent research before our human rights are removed. If you would like to assist this debate please sign up to my newsletter on my website www.vaccinationdecisions.net and I will keep you updated on these issues.
Boom: another vaccine whistleblower steps out of the shadows
MMR vaccine dangerous
Vaccine Empire wobbles on its foundations
The new film Vaxxed highlights one whistleblower, researcher William Thompson, who publicly admitted he and his CDC colleagues lied, cheated, and committed gross fraud in exonerating the MMR vaccine and pretending it had no connection to autism.
Now we have another: Dr. Peter Fletcher.
The Daily Mail has the story (3/29/16): “Former [British] science chief: ‘MMR fears coming true'”.
“A former Government medical officer responsible for deciding whether medicines are safe has accused the Government of ‘utterly inexplicable complacency’ over the MMR triple vaccine for children.”
“Dr Peter Fletcher, who was Chief Scientific Officer at the Department of Health, said if it is proven that the jab causes autism, ‘the refusal by governments to evaluate the risks properly will make this one of the greatest scandals in medical history’.”
“He added that after agreeing to be an expert witness on drug-safety trials for parents’ lawyers, he had received and studied thousands of documents relating to the case which he believed the public had a right to see.”
“He said he has seen a ‘steady accumulation of evidence’ from scientists worldwide that the [MMR] measles, mumps and rubella jab is causing brain damage in certain children.”
“But he added: ‘There are very powerful people in positions of great authority in Britain and elsewhere who have staked their reputations and careers on the safety of MMR and they are willing to do almost anything to protect themselves’.”
“In the late Seventies, Dr. Fletcher served as Chief Scientific Officer at the DoH [Dept. of Health] and Medical Assessor to the Committee on Safety of Medicines, meaning he was responsible for deciding if new vaccines were safe.”
“He first expressed concerns about MMR in 2001, saying safety trials before the vaccine’s introduction in Britain were inadequate.”
“Now he says the theoretical fears he raised appear to be becoming reality.”
“He said the rising tide of autism cases and growing scientific understanding of autism-related bowel disease have convinced him the MMR vaccine may be to blame.”
“‘Clinical and scientific data is steadily accumulating that the live measles virus in MMR can cause brain, gut and immune system damage in a subset of vulnerable children,’ he said.”
“‘There’s no one conclusive piece of scientific evidence, no “smoking gun”, because there very rarely is when adverse drug reactions are first suspected. When vaccine damage in very young children is involved, it is harder to prove the links.'”
“‘But it is the steady accumulation of evidence, from a number of respected universities, teaching hospitals and laboratories around the world, that matters here. There’s far too much to ignore. Yet government health authorities are, it seems, more than happy to do so’.”
The pressure is building on the medical establishment and their press lackeys. Of course, they will try to keep the lid on. But more and more people around the world—many through bitter personal experience with vaccines—are waking up.
The statements of establishment front men ring hollow.
“Well, of course these vaccines are safe, remarkably so. How could any sane person think otherwise?”
Sane people are thinking otherwise. They know they’re being conned, and their health and the health of their children is under attack.
More whistleblowers are going to come out of the closet. The strange notion of having an actual conscience is making a comeback.
Even media androids, whose job it is to spread disinformation, are going to realize they’re nothing more than dupes for the vaccine cartel. And some of them aren’t going to like the realization, especially when it interrupts their sleep at night.
Especially as they come to understand they’re aiding and abetting the lifelong infliction of brain damage on innocent children.
Not everyone can blithely go on their way, doing their dirty work, in the face of that knowledge.
I’ve been working as an independent reporter for 30 years, and I can tell you that at this point, the whole vaccine propaganda apparatus is like a porcelain vase sitting on a table. And an earthquake is commencing.
Somewhere, right now, as I write this, a vaccine expert none of us yet knows about is sitting in his office thinking: “Thompson and Fletcher have come forward. It might be time for me to tell what I know, what I’ve been hiding all these years.”
He isn’t a hero. He’s a chronic scientific liar who can’t stand the conspiracy of silence any longer.
He’s remembering what a conscience is.
And he’s calculating the relative consequences of voluntarily coming clean now vs. being exposed later.
He’s sniffing which way the new wind is blowing.
Open letter to EMA re: HPV vaccine safety
Note from SaneVax: Apparently medical professionals, scientists, vaccine safety advocates and the general public are not satisified with the recent EMA conclusion regarding HPV vaccine safety. They are not willing to accept the fact that the written statement on HPV vaccine safety issued by the European Medicines Agency spent more time attempting to discredit those who filed medically documented questions than it did dealing with an honest evaluation of the safety concerns being raised around the world after Gardasil and Cervarix administration. Medical consumers are no longer willing to accept the word of purported experts unless it is backed up by sound science.
Therefore, the following letter was just emailed to over 120 European Medicines Agency representatives with 446 signatures representing HPV vaccine survivors from over 30 countries requesting scientifically documented answers to the attached questions and an open public meeting with participants from both sides of the debate invited to discuss HPV vaccine safety.
Open letter to EMA regarding HPV vaccine safety
24 April 2016
Dear EMA representatives:
I am sure you are all aware of the European Medicines Agency’s recent ‘investigation’ into HPV vaccine safety. I am also certain you understand that the investigation was cursory at best and most definitely not designed to uncover any real problem that may exist with HPV vaccines. The arbitrary and most likely pre-ordained conclusion reached must not go unchallenged. Public health and safety is at stake, particularly when many scientists around the world follow your lead.
One prime example is a recent study published in a Canadian medical journal entitled, “Adverse events following HPV vaccination, Alberta 2006-2014.” Despite the fact that this study uncovered information indicating 1 in 10 Gardasil users were either admitted to a hospital or an emergency room within 42 days of injection, the conclusion was “Rates of AEFI after HPV immunization in Alberta are low and consistent with types of events seen elsewhere.”
With all due respect, we believe the EMA would find it extremely difficult to locate any country where 1 in 10 previously healthy teens were admitted to hospitals and/or emergency rooms after any given event, including receipt of a vaccine.
With that in mind, representatives from several countries got together over the last few months to compose a letter asking the questions the recent investigation neglected to address.
Initially, the attached list of questions was meant to be sent directly to those people in charge of the EMA’s HPV vaccine safety investigation. However, because of the near universal response to inquiries about HPV vaccines worldwide, we came to understand that a letter sent directly to EMA representatives would most likely not elicit any meaningful response.
Therefore, this letter with both attachments will be published via the SaneVax website and be free for distribution by anyone who cares to do so. The primary purpose is to make all representatives of the EMA well aware of the fact that every action you make is being closely scrutinized by not only those injured and their families, but also medical and scientific professionals around the globe.
The secondary goal of open publication is to show all who are concerned about the safety profile of HPV vaccines that they are not alone. Medical professionals, scientists and medical consumers will no longer tolerate attempts to discredit independent research based on the fact that their research and experience does not fall in line with theories put forth by general consensus supported only by questionable research.
On April 15, 2016, the EMA published a statement online entitled, “Listening to the public’s views on the safety of medicines” where Deputy Executive Director, Noël Wathion, states:
“Public hearings will enrich the scientific decision-making process on the safety of medicines. Although we have many years of experience in involving patients and healthcare professionals in our work, public hearings are a new concept for EMA as they will open up the process of assessing medicines in the EU to the wider public for the first time.”
Public hearings will be held on a case-by-case basis, where the Committee determines that collecting the views of the public would bring added value to its review.
The EMA’s statements and decisions regarding HPV vaccines impact people around the globe. Society cannot wait decades to determine whether HPV vaccines will actually impact cancer rates if the “1 in 10” figure put forth in the Canadian study is anywhere near accurate for other countries.
Therefore, it is imperative for the EMA to meet with and seriously take into account the views of scientists, medical professionals and citizens who are dealing with the impact of HPV vaccines on a daily basis under real world conditions. An open public hearing is the ideal format for a discussion on the real-world consequences of HPV vaccine utilization.
The undersigned (complete list attached) request scientifically documented answers to the attached questions be provided within the next 30 days and an open public meeting as described above to be held before the end of 2016.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this critical public health issue.
Steve Hinks, Press Officer of the UK Association of HPV Vaccine Injured Daughters (AHVID) and SaneVax Ambassador
Freda Birrell, Chairman of AHVID, representing 285 families whose lives have been severely impacted by HPV vaccines
Karsten Viborg, Director, Chairman, National HPV side effect group in Denmark on behalf of over 5,000 affected families
Alicia Capilla Lanagrán, President of the AAVP, representing over 50 families impacted in Spain
Kiva Murphy, REGRET member on behalf of over 300 affected families in Ireland
Monica Leon Del Rio, President of Rebuilding Hope Association on behalf of 559 families severely affected in Colombia.
Stephen Tunley, Board of Directors SaneVax Inc., on behalf of 50 severely affected families in Australia
Gayle Dickson, Founder of Gardasil Awareness New Zealand, on behalf of over 600 families affected in NZ
Norma Erickson, President of SaneVax Inc., on behalf of 1679 families who reported disabilities and deaths after HPV vaccines in the United States VAERS system and the 446 signatories from over 30 countries in the attached file.
Mr. Steve Hinks received the following response from the European Medicines Agency before noon on the 25th of April 2016:
Dear Mr. Hinks,
We hereby acknowledge receipt of your letter of 24 April 2016 and the questions to EMA contained therein as well as your earlier e-mail correspondence of 18 April to Nathalie Bere.
I confirm that we will do our utmost to respond to your queries within 30 days as you request.
Head of Patients and Healthcare Professionals Department
Stakeholder and Communication Division
European Medicines Agency
30 Churchill Place | Canary Wharf | London E14 5EU | United Kingdom