Safe Vaccine Debate – 1. Cinema Libre: Injecting Aluminium 2. The Australia’s Draconian Vaccine Laws 3. Dr Judy Wileyman Report: Open Letter to University of Wollongong & Newsletter #170

1. Cinema Libre:  Injecting Aluminium
In the early 90s, a mysterious muscular disease began to surface among multiple patients in France. A team of doctors in Paris discovered that these patients had developed a new disease called Macrophagic Myofascitis, or MMF, which occurs when the aluminum hydroxide adjuvant from a vaccine remains embedded in the muscle tissue.

You go from doctor to doctor having exams and blood work done, and no one can find what’s wrong with you.
It was so painful, I couldn’t stand to be touched.
The pains keep spreading throughout your body.
When I was searching for a diagnosis, seeing doctors… they chalk it up to mental illness.
These patients have severe symptoms of disease, pain, intense weariness, cognitive disorders.
I’ve been ill since 1994. I was diagnosed in 1999.
We were backed by enough scientific proof blaming aluminum salts in vaccines for our illness.
Post-vaccinal granuloma occurs in anyone who receives a vaccination containing aluminum.
Ann Pathol. 2001 Apr;21(2):149-52.

[Post-vaccination granuloma due to aluminium hydroxide].

Bordet AL1Michenet PCohen CArbion FEkindi NBonneau CKerdraon RCoville M.
Author information


Post-vaccination granulomas a well-known reaction due to aluminium adsorbed vaccines. We report three cases of children who developed subcutaneous nodules at the site of a previous injection of Tetracoq*vaccine (tetanus, diphtheria, Bordetella pertussis, poliovirus). Histologically, the lesions were characterized by a necrotizing granulomatous reaction with eosinophilic crystalline material. This material stained positively with the solochrome cyanine stain and was pink-purple. This aluminium stain enabled diagnosis of post-immunization injection-site reaction due to aluminium.

PMID: 11373585 [Indexed for MEDLINE]

2. : Australia’s Draconian Vaccine Laws and Game of Thrones
Aug. 31st, 2017

Game of Thrones DVDsThe noose is tightening around the necks of Australian parents and enlightened physicians when it comes to vaccination. If you are a parent and disagree with the government’s increasingly draconian mandatory vaccination laws, you may face severe financial and social sanction.
For a long time now, I’ve been hearing about this TV phenomenon called the Game of Thrones,1 so I recently decided to see for myself what all the fuss was about. In the last two weeks, I’ve binged and managed to view all seven seasons—67 episodes. I’m hooked. The draconian code of conduct and graphic violence is disturbing but, fortunately (or unfortunately), you get used to it, and it’s vastly outweighed by the production quality of the series and gripping storylines. Besides, it’s fictional, right?

But not so in Australia, where the government’s vaccination policies and laws have become intolerably oppressive. That situation is truly draconian in so many ways, and the frightening stories coming out Australia have no redeeming value. Plus, it is real and there’s just no getting used to it or away from it.

In Australia, the government has implemented a vaccination policy of “no jab, no pay.” This means that parents who do not vaccinate their children can have up to $15,000 in childcare welfare and tax credit payments withheld from them as a way to financially punish them and coerce them into submitting to vaccination without their voluntary informed consent. Even parents who “conscientiously object to vaccination for philosophical or religious reasons are also not able to collect the payments.”2 3 4

Such a draconian tactic is sometimes referred to as offering “financial incentives,”3 but to many of those targeted it must feel a lot like persecution.

According to Australia’s Department of Health, “The Australian government believes there is no excuse for parents who, without a valid medical reason, choose not to immunize their children.”3 Of course, what is not up for discussion is that, according to public health officials, there are almost no “valid” medical reasons for not vaccinating a child.5

Consistent with this mindset, Australia has eliminated all religious exemptions to vaccination.

Now, the only way for a child to legally forego vaccines in the country is on medical grounds. Among the reasons a child can gain exemption are the onset of a brain disease within the first seven days after a previous vaccination, an allergy to a preservative or antibiotic ingredient present in the vaccines, “unstable neurological disease” and “immediate severe acute allergic or anaphylactic reaction after any previous vaccination,” according to the qualifying form.6

Earlier this year, Australia’s Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull announced that he would encourage states in his country to adopt laws that would ban children that have not been vaccinated from enrolling in preschools and childcare centers.78 States like South Australia are already considering fining schools that would not comply with such laws—up to $30,000.9

Last month, the Australian Medical Association (AMA) suggested withholding funding from schools that do not actively promote vaccinating students.10

The noose is tightening around the necks of Australian parents and enlightened physicians when it comes to vaccination. If you are a parent and disagree with the government’s increasingly draconian mandatory vaccination laws, you may face severe financial and social sanctions. If you are a compassionate physician in Australia, who follows the time-honored physician’s oath of “First, do no harm” and helps parents obtain vaccine exemptions for their children, you can become a target for sanctions, too.

Referring to three doctors currently under investigation by the Victorian Health Department and the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) for helping families obtain exemptions to vaccination, Australia’s Minister of Health Greg Hunt promised:

“If it is accurate that there are registered doctors who are advocating an anti-vaccination position, then they will have the full force of the authorities come down on them. But let us be absolutely clear, there will be no sympathy, none at all from the government if the authorities take the strongest possible decisions.”11

Hunt warned, “[I]f there are other doctors out there preaching anti-vaccination positions, then we will find them.”12

It is ominous that doctors are threatening and hunting down fellow doctors to punish them for exercising professional judgment and conscience when it comes to vaccination. It is like so many scenes from Game of Thrones, in which those who refuse to “bend the knee” to the “rightful” heir to the Iron Throne, are mercilessly hunted down and punished.

It is hard to believe that what is happening in Australia is very real and not fiction.



3. Dr Judy Wileyman Report: Open Letter to UOW + Newsletter #170

Open Letter
University of Wollongong Academics
Copied to UOW Vice-Chancellor Paul Wellings

Dear Professors Heather Yeatman and Alison Jones,

For further information on the false information that you are providing to the public about immunisation please read my latest Newsletter 170 Michael Gannon (AMA President) and the Suppression of Vaccination Science in Australia( )

You can choose to ignore this information but you can never say that you were not informed. All UOW academics who have signed their name to your unsupported comments about immunisation are complicit in any harm that these comments may cause in the population. Particularly as your comments are being used to introduce mandatory and coercive vaccination policies in the Australian population.

In the past UOW has allowed lobby group activists such as John Cunningham and Matthew Berryman to misuse the university’s complaint procedures to make false allegations about my research to the public. Further the UOW has never rectified the false information provided to the public about my UOW research by John Cunningham and others in the media.

I have provided a link to the description of John Cunningham’s inappropriate behaviour in debating this topic and it is currently being investigated. I will keep you and the community informed about this investigation.

Please act to ensure that the public is accurately informed about the risks of vaccines by addressing the evidence provided in my PhD thesis and either supporting your claims with evidence or removing your comment and articles suppressing debate of vaccinationscience  from the UOW website.  

Kind regards,

Dr. Judy Wilyman  


Newsletter 170 Michael Gannon (AMA President) and the Suppression of VaccinationScience in Australia

Recently the film Vaxxed; From Cover-up to Catastrophe has been touring Australia to sell out crowds as parents discover the fraudulent science that the Australian Medical Association (AMA) is using to claim that the link between vaccines and autism is discredited.

In addition, Michael Gannon, the AMA president, stated in the media (channel 10) on 21 May 2017 that:
the Health Department was spending a lot of time disproving the quack theories about the risks of vaccines’.

This statement is untrue and it is disrespectful to parents because the Health Department is ignoring the skyrocketing autism in Australian children that correlates directly with the MMR vaccine and the expanding vaccination schedule – a schedule that is not designed by the Australian government.

In my No Jab No Play rally speech in WA on 28 May 2017 I call for Michael Gannon to step down from his position with the AMA (at 31.41 mins in the speech). This is because he is dismissing parents valid concerns about vaccines as ‘quack theories’. This is contrary to evidence-based medicine and his role in promoting public health in the community.

My PhD thesis is published on the University of Wollongong (UOW) website and it describes the undone science in government vaccination policies. This lack of hard evidence is allowing government’s to claim that vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ – instead of using definitive proof.

When Australian Doctors speak up in support of the medical literature that shows the risks of vaccines they are threatened with de-registration from their professional body. Recently Dr. John Piesse publicly supported parents who do not want to vaccinate their children. He stated:

This is a matter of principle. You have got a public health policy which is causing harm’.

This doctor is now under investigation by the Australian Health Practitioners Regulatory Authority (AHPRA) instead of being allowed to debate the science. The AMA is dismissing the science as ‘anti-vaccination‘ instead of encouraging debate. How can public health be protected if the science showing the risk of vaccines is ignored and not included in the debate?

This is a crime against humanity if the AMA is mandating, with coercive measures, a medical intervention that is harming the population and doing so without allowing doctors to debate the science. Australia is now using the terrorism laws to ban parents with autistic children from discussing the science.

Community health is at risk with the No Jab No Pay/Play laws (and they have not been justified to the public) and Michael Gannon has not explained why the AMA is ignoring the medical risks of vaccination by implementing these laws.

Sweden has rejected the adoption of coercive and mandatory vaccination policies because of the known health risks of vaccines and also because of the influence of the pharmaceutical companies in marketing their own research to the public and politicians.

So can Michael Gannon explain why the Australian population is different to Sweden or is it time for AHPRA to investigate the false and misleading information being provided by Dr. Michael Gannon and Dr. John Cunningham to doctors, politicians and the media?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *