1. Catherine Frompovich : The World Health Organization’s Faux Pas About Vaccine Adverse Events And Deaths –Jul. 8th, 2017
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have maintained their VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) since the late 1980s, almost like a post-marketing survey/analysis, since no one probably pays attention to all the adverse events reported, or actually is doing something to correct what is chemical abuse to children. Is that what consensus vaccine science amounts to?
Even more importantly, we find confirmation of damages awarded by the Vaccine Court Masters, plus attorneys’ fees, which now total $3.56 BILLION [1]. What I think readers really ought to understand is vaccine awards went from $1,371,761.92 for fiscal year 1989 to $230,140,251.20 for fiscal year 2016. Fiscal year 2017 seems to be lagging behind in postings and updates. What do those 2016 payout figures for “Petitioners’ Award Amount” shout out? There’s an almost 230 times increase in vaccine damages paid from FY 1989 to FY 2016! So, what’s going on?
It appears more vaccinees are experiencing post-vaccination damage. However, mandatory vaccine reporting may not be submitted to VAERS with subsequent filings to the Vaccine Court. However, there is a most significant data bank, which emerges from Page 5 of the HRSA reports, insofar as DEATHS are recorded as filed and attributed to vaccines and their adverse events. I encourage readers to check out Page 5 to understand the gravity of what’s going on within the World Health Organization stating vaccines cannot cause death!
According to that HRSA report, here are the deaths as reported:
Vaccines: DT 9; DTP 696; DTP-HIB 8; DTaP 80; DTap-HepB-IPV 30; DTaP-HIB 1;
DTaP-IPV-HIB 18; Td 3; Tdap 2; Tetanus 2; Hepatitis A 6; Hepatitis B 56;
HIB 3; HPV 14; Influenza 115; IPV 14; OPV 28; Measles 19; Meningococcal 2;
MMR 58; MMR-Varicella 1; Pertussis 3; Pneumococcal Conjugate 9;
Rotavirus 1; Rubella 4; Varicella 9; Nonqualified1 9; Unspecified2 9 for a total
of 1,209 deaths and 16,523 injuries.
But there’s a snake in the woodpile regarding those statistics. Only 5,143 claims were compensated while 10,169 were dismissed! An absolute disgrace since the 1986 law passed by Congress has not been honored in its fullest intent, i.e., everyone harmed by vaccines will be compensated.
However, the more the Vaccine Court Masters can ‘cheat’ damaged vaccinees out of what’s rightfully due to claimants, the more the U.S. Treasury can deposit and keep from the taxes paid on each vaccine sold! I’ve written about that and even tried shaking it down at Treasury, only to be totally disregarded. What does that tell you?
Another thing happening with vaccine information and data is the Internet is being sanitized of incriminating vaccination information and one is most likely to receive the following prompt from numerous search engines:
What is totally incomprehensible to me, who has been researching and studying vaccine damages since they first started appearing via moms telling doctors I either knew or worked with that their children were damaged after receiving a vaccination! That began in the late 1980s. No doctor knows a child better than a mom who has given birth to and lovingly cared for her child.
However, the white coats have not been faithful to their Hippocratic Oath: First, do no harm. Vaccines contain inordinate amounts of neurotoxic chemicals and heavy metals, plus there have been no long-term studies proving vaccines—just short term studies for vaccine licensure—only a religious-like belief system of consensus science that vaccines cannot cause harm or even death, and any adverse vaccine event is a ‘coincidence’.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has a huge can of worms to deal with regarding its 2013 pontification and “new methodology to classify adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in March 2013.” [2]
July 4, 2017, two Indian medical personnel published a “letter stating that the methodology was flawed.” It was published in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics.[2]
The critical and flawed issue involved is:
According to the two, WHO’s new classification, in essence, implies that no death can result from vaccination and, if any death does occur, it is only coincidental and not due to the vaccine. This, they say, does not address children’s safety. [2]
Here is the letter published by Jacob Puliyel, a pediatrician and member of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation, and Anant Phadke, an executive member of the All India Drug Action Network, who have expressed their concerns over the new system for classifying AEFI.
According to them [Puliyel and Phadke], WHO’s new classification, in essence, implies that no death can result from vaccination and, if any death does occur, it is only coincidental and not due to the vaccine. [2]
Such an outrageously ridiculous statement made by the World Health Organization ought to automatically disqualify the WHO from any further participation in global health politics! For such an asinine statement to blatantly emerge from what ought to be considered a prestigious health organization is nothing short of medical malpractice or total public health ineptness, plus a lack of backbone to stand up against what amounts to chemical child abuse. To deny health harms can occur after vaccinations is nothing short of tobacco science taken to a zenith!
What seems to be happening is a corporate-mandate-and-rule-siege has taken over at every level of society, especially those areas where controllers can enforce their consensus science about vaccines, which has decimated more than two generations of children globally.
James Lyons Weiler says in his article “Fake Science: When is Medical ‘Science’ Not Science?”
If Science is to survive in the new Corporatocracy, this practice must be met with strongly worded letters to the deciding Editor by the Editorial Board with threats of mass resignation and counter-boycott, if necessary. An Editorial Board must stand by the Journal’s peer-review process, and the Journal must stand by the outcome of that process. To do otherwise is to allow Corporations to sanitize the literature of what they deem to be “problematic” studies, one study at a time. [5] [CJF emphasis]
The Indian medical personnel are correct in taking on the WHO, especially since India experienced 47,500 children being paralyzed in a 2011 Bill Gates Foundation polio vaccination campaign, plus the problems with the HPV vaccine [3-4].
This video explains the problems with the oral polio vaccine; which polio vaccine is considered ‘safer’.
Dr. Maurice Hilleman, MD, Merck’s premiere vaccine inventor candidly discusses SV-40.
There’s a lot more monkey business going on in vaccine pseudoscience than we apparently know, especially now with new vaccines coming to market. They can contain nanobots, RFID chips and other genetically modified microorganisms, which can be included in mandated vaccines. Do you really know what’s in your vaccine? How about those patented ‘corporate secrets’? Also, we must remember vaccines go hand-in-hand with the UN’s Agenda 21!
Probably nothing can be said more poignantly about the UN’s Agenda 21 than the words of the late Maj. Gen. Bert Stubblebine (US Army, ret.):
UN Agenda 21 is the linchpin of global depopulation plans. Defeating Agenda 21 locally requires understanding the Delphi Technique of manipulated consensus… but the core of this attack on humanity, through our food, health and property, is The Great Culling – the plan to reduce the human population by ninety-five percent. This will not happen if we stand our ground!
There is an extreme and serious medical-legal problem in deliberately obfuscating medical, scientific and research information.
Stating deaths after vaccines is only coincidental and cannot be due to vaccines must be objected to by the entire medical community, if it has any scruples left, and the entire global population. We can’t let them get away with vaccine pseudoscience!
Source: [5]
References:
[1] https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/data/statisticsreport.pdf, Pg. 9
[2] http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/problems-detected-in-who-s-post-vaccination-philosophy-58226
[3] http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/supreme-court-in-india-to-rule-on-merck-fraud-regarding-hpv-vaccine-deaths/
[4] http://sanevax.org/india-supreme-court-hpv-vaccine-controversy-continues/
[5] https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2016/12/30/fake-science-when-is-medical-science-not-science/
Resource:
Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized
http://agenda21news.com/2015/05/depopulation-test-run-75-of-children-who-received-vaccines-in-mexican-town-now-dead-or-hospitalized/
2. The Dr Judy Wilyman Report: Newsletter 164 ABC Journalist, Emma Alberici, Peddling False Information on Vaccines – 30 June 2017
On 26 June 2017, Emma Alberici, wrote a story for the ABC titled ‘Why do politicians get away with peddling porkies and ‘alternative facts’.
This is interesting because she is demonstrating the answer with her own misinformed story.
The health of a community is at risk when journalists are no longer held accountable for the misinformation they provide on health and environmental subjects.
In her story she states that Senator Hanson suggested there “might be a link between vaccinationand autism – only to apologise for her remarks”.
In fact, Pauline Hanson’s statement is correct and it is supported by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). And Pauline Hanson did not apologise for this particular remark, she apologised for another comment. This statement is completely true – Vaccines ‘might’ be a cause of autism and a causal link has been found in data by the US CDC.
Just investigate “Vaxxed: From Cover up to Catastrophe”.
There are also many scientific studies linking vaccines as a plausible cause of autism, but Emma Alberici, cannot produce a single study that proves vaccines do not cause autism.
This is critical to claiming that vaccines do not cause autism.
It is also critical for any policy that is being claimed to be based on “the best available scientific evidence”.
A good investigative journalist would not rely on health statements made by politicians or lobby group activists to base their story but they would investigate both sides of the academic debate.
This journalist concludes by saying ‘You need only look to the tobacco industry. Think of how many people died believing smoking cigarettes did not cause cancer.’
She should also have added that this was because doctors were promoting cigarettes as healthy products for many decades.
I hope Emma Alberici can provide a study that proves vaccines do not cause autism because otherwise she is providing porkies to the public about a very important health issue.
Dr. Judy Wilyman PhD
Bachelor of Science, University of NSW
Diploma of Education (Science), University of NSW,
Master of Science (Population Health), University of Wollongong
PHD The Science and Politics of Australia’s Vaccination Policies, University of Wollongong
Website: Vaccination Decisions www.vaccinationdecisions.net
3. Elizabeth Hart’s Overvaccination Report: Ethics, Conflict of Interest, GSK & Meningococcal B Vaccination
Hi, FYI, see below my email to the Chair of the Human Research Ethics Committee which approved the GSK Bexsero meningococcal B vax trial in South Australia.
Looks like the same pattern is underway to get the GSK Bexsero vaccine on the Australian taxpayer-funded vax schedule as occurred with Gardasil HPV vaccination, i.e. just keep pushing until the Government rolls over and adopts it on the schedule, thereby setting in train the domino effect around the world, and another multi-billion dollar vaccine earner for Big Pharma…this is such a massive scandal…
From: Elizabeth Hart <eliz.hart25@gmail.com>
Subject: Ethics, conflicts of interest, GSK, and meningococcal B vaccination
To: “Thorne, Mary (Health)” <Mary.Thorne@sa.gov.au>
Open email for the attention of:
This polarised debate is serving the community very badly as it is hindering open discussion about the burgeoning taxpayer-funded Immunise Australia Program, and emerging problems with vaccines, e.g. the pertussis vaccine which appears to be driving the development of new strains.
Are these students being properly informed they are guinea pigs for the GSK Bexsero vaccine, a product which has been rejected three times for the taxpayer-funded vaccination schedule by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, due to multiple uncertainties in relation to the clinical effectiveness against the disease and other reasons? (See for example Recommendations made by the PBAC July 2015 – Subsequent decisions not to recommend.)
At this stage we have no idea of the possibly deleterious long-term consequences of introducing a vaccine for this very rare disease.
The Adelaide Advertiser reports: “It is hoped the findings will provide a strong push to get the vaccine on the taxpayer-funded National Immunisation Program.”
(See: Free meningococcal B-strain vaccine for 60,000 SA high school students under study into immunisation effect, 13 December 2016).
Professor Murphy, I request your considered response to my previous email below re questionable meningococcal W and B vaccination (dated 9 February 2017).
Professor McIntyre is also Director of the National Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance (NCIRS), among other vaccine policy influencing roles.
Do these children and their parents fully understand that the still experimental Bexsero vaccine was rejected three times by the PBAC, and that they are guinea pigs for this vaccine for a rare disease?
She also presents at conferences sponsored by vaccine companies.
Another ATAGI member, Associate Professor Jodie McVernon, who was on Norman Swan’s ABC Health Report discussing meningococcal W and B, is also an investigator on clinical trials funded by GlaxoSmithKline, bioCSL, Novartis and Pfizer, and funded to attend workshops and symposiums sponsored by vaccine companies[2], although these conflicts of interest weren’t disclosed when she was interviewed on Norman Swan’s ABC Health Report.
Brief conflict of information re ATAGI members is only now accessible on the Immunise Australia website because I persisted in requesting transparency on this matter, see my letter to then Prime Minister Tony Abbott: http://users.on.net/~peter.hart/Letter_to_Tony_Abbott_PM_re_vax_policy.pdf
There is no historical record of his conflicts of interests on the ATAGI website.
Professor Booy is also a Board member of the Immunisation Coalition (since 2012 when I believe it was then known as the Influenza Specialist Group), which is sponsored and supported by GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, Roche Australia, Seqirus Australia, Astra Zeneka, Mylan and Bupa Australia.
Professor Booy is also on the Public Affairs and Advisory Committee of the Immunisation Coalition.
Professor Booy’s association with the industry-sponsored Immunisation Coalition (formerly Influenza Specialist Group) was not disclosed in the Medical Observer article re the Bexsero meningococcal B vaccine, and is currently not disclosed on the Meningococcal Australia website nor the NCIRS website as far as I can see.
(Professor Booy is also on the TGA’s Australian Influenza Vaccine Committee (AIVC), along with ATAGI member A/Professor Helen Marshall.)
It is also important to consider if implementation of a vaccine will result in the emergence of new strains, as Dr Norman Swan suggested on the ABC Health Report, i.e.
It is your duty to ensure the Federal Health Minister, Greg Hunt, is properly briefed in this regard.
This government department should be subjected to an urgent investigation as it is the vehicle being used to impose an ever-increasing amount of questionable vaccine products and re-vaccinations without open and transparent consultation with the community.
It also needs to be examined how this department is liaising with the vaccine industry and using the mainstream media, including the taxpayer funded ABC and SBS, to promote vaccine products and inhibit critical analysis of vaccination policy.
6. Subsidising meningococcal B vaccine deemed too costly for the federal budget. ABC News, 4 November 2016.
From: Elizabeth Hart <eliz.hart25@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:46 PM
Subject: Meningococcal W vaccination
To: Brendan.Murphy@health.gov.au
Professor Murphy, Dr Norman Swan’s Health Report – Deadly meningococcal W concerns[1] notes a free vaccination program is being rolled out in Western Australia for teenagers with a vaccine “which will cover the new strain (along with three other strains)”.
It has subsequently been announced that Victoria and New South Wales will implement similar programs.[2]
Is this a backdoor way for pharmaceutical companies to push their products, i.e. by dealing directly with the states?
It is also important to consider if implementation of a vaccine will result in the emergence of new strains, as Dr Swan suggested, i.e.
Overall, meningococcal disease in Australia was decreasing after serogroup C vaccine was introduced, and that’s because even the B disease has also been slowly declining over time, for reasons we don’t understand.”
Will children and their parents be allowed to consider the risks and benefits, as is required for legally valid consent, as acknowledged by the Australian Immunisation Handbook?
Will they be informed the disease is “very, very rare”.
Will they be informed that the incidence of the B strain of the disease is going down without vaccination?
- is this vaccination for a “very, very rare” disease justifiable considering the millions of dollars that will be spent in WA, NSW and Victoria, which might be better used elsewhere?
- has the possibility of adverse events after this vaccination been properly considered?
Professor Murphy, I would appreciate your response on this matterRegardsElizabeth HartReference:1. Deadly meningococcal W concerns. ABC Health Report. Monday 30 January 2017: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/healthreport/deadly-w-strain-of-meningococcal-disease/82239142. Victoria to offer free meningococcal vaccine to teenagers after increase in cases: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-08/meningococcal-vaccine-offered-to-victorian-teens/82503583. Recommendations made by the PBAC July 2015 – Subsequent decisions not to recommend: http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/pbac-outcomes/pbac-outcomes-2015-07 (see pages 3-4)
6 responses to “Safe Vaccine Debate 1. WHO Faux Pas About Adverse Events & Deaths 2. Dr Judy Wilyman Report – ABC Misreporting 3. Elizabeth Hart’s Overvaccination Report: Ethics, Conflict of Interest, GSK & Meningococcal B Vaccination”
Thank you for your excellent research…note first item of business for Greg Hunt was support meningitis VAX at urging of Newscorp /GSK after stories of deadly case ran in paper urging people to VAX same time GSK withheld supply and total people to call Hunt..supply came when he reversed PBAC to redirect fund as unfavourable cost benefit analysis not to mention cross reaction to bacterial OMV and human cell membranes..etc excellent to see someone so intelligent and organized taking up this fight before many SA kids get harmed
Elizabeth Hart is a champion in my eyes.Keep prodding Elizabeth as children NEED people like you.I can not understand how intelligent men and women fail to see what is right in front of them.Vaccines do cause injuries and dare I say AUTISM but our powers that be are completely blind.
Vaccination protects children from serious illness Vaccine preventable diseases, such as measles, mumps, and whooping cough, which are still a threat and with out vaccination children would be at more risks. There is no evidence that vaccines cause autism. In 2015, a study performed in Japan showed NO association between autism and the MMR vaccine. To not vaccinate your child is putting them at risk.
Those statements are untrue Jake and you are endangering public health with this simplistic assessment. If you are interested in the debate you could start by doing some research and using an evidence-based argument to debate this topic. We are currently over-vaccinating children and it is necessary to assess each vaccine separately to determine its value to public health when it is known that all vaccines have side-effects in some children and life-threatening chronic illness is escalating with the expansion of the vaccination schedule. It is not acceptable (or scientific) to keep adding vaccines to the schedule if you have not proved that the vaccines are not causing this illness in our children. The government’s policy is not based on scientific methodology because it has not investigated this possibility.
“The anti-vax proponents also hold extremist views because vaccination principles are generally sound. It is the manufacturers supported by a medical cartel, that are the real villains in this drama because they continue to make and promote unsafe vaccines and develop new vaccines without any formal evidence. It is also obvious that vaccination does not equate to immunisation!” this statement doesn’t make sense – if vaccination does not equal immunisation, vaccine principles are inherently NOT SOUND. vaccines don’t work, have never been shown to work, cause more harm than good since the beginning.
There are many untruths being promoted by governments/doctors about vaccines and vaccination prinicples as promoted by governments and doctors are not sound. Here is information from a Harvard immunologist that dispels many of the myths that are being promoted about vaccines http://govtslaves.info/2017/11/harvard-immunologist-unvaccinated-children-pose-zero-risk-to-anyone-and-heres-why/